Industry insightsDec 1, 2026StrategyBridgeAI

Why most companies stop after one acquisition, and how to build a repeatable M&A process

Cover of M&A as a System, the StrategyBridgeAI Industry Report

For most companies, the first acquisition is also the last. 62% of all acquirers in our dataset of more than 1.6 million recorded acquisitions have completed exactly one deal. Of those, only 11% were active as a buyer again in the past two years.

Our industry report M&A as a System comes to a clear conclusion: what separates systematic acquirers from everyone else is less about capital than about organization. This article looks at what holds companies back after their first deal, and which building blocks make M&A repeatable.

This article covers one chapter. The full report also looks at the role of financial investors, the geographic hotspots of M&A, the outlook for next year and the assessments of six M&A experts. For more insights, download the report M&A as a System here for free.

In this article you'll learn:

  • Why low acquisition activity is often not a deliberate decision
  • Which barriers M&A experts see after the first deal
  • Why systematic M&A does not require a large M&A team
  • Five building blocks you can put in place without restructuring your organization

One deal, then silence

How often companies acquire again

GroupFigure
Acquirers with exactly one acquisition62% of all acquirers
Of these, active again in the past two years11%
Strategic acquirers active in the past two years55%
Acquirers with a systematic M&A approach8%

This is an observation, not a judgment. For many companies, using M&A selectively is the right call. The relevant question is whether low acquisition activity reflects a deliberate strategic decision, or whether M&A as a growth option has simply never been assessed systematically. Even regular acquirers are often self-critical on this point:

“We are one of those companies ourselves that have completed only four acquisitions over the past five years. That is actually far too few.” Dr. Dirk Pramann, Mition GmbH Mid-Market Investments

What holds companies back after the first deal

The six experts we interviewed name resources, process know-how and management capacity rather than capital or financing as the main cause. Three barriers stand out.

Barriers to repeat acquisitions, according to the experts

BarrierExpert view
Fear of failed integration“In my view, the fear that the integration will fail is even greater than the concern about broken-deal costs.” Dirk Sachse, CFN Corporate Finance Nord
Ability to close“I believe significantly more companies enter the process, but only a small number actually make it to a deal.” Dr. Dirk Pramann, Mition
Resources“A structured M&A process requires resources that often only larger acquirers are able or willing to commit.” Jens M. Wellbrock, Renneberg

One point came up repeatedly that is not visible in the data itself: the limiting factor is often not the willingness to acquire, but the ability to bring a transaction to completion.

Size helps, but it does not decide

Strategic acquirers generate around 4.5 times the average revenue of opportunistic acquirers. At the same time, they are on average only about half as old. Systematic M&A is therefore not a matter of long corporate tradition, and size and acquisition activity likely reinforce each other.

“Companies that master M&A as a repeatable growth channel can scale significantly faster.” Daniel Funk, CEO & Co-Founder, CVT Partner

The central finding of the report: systematic M&A is not a privilege of the largest or best-capitalized companies. It is primarily a question of the structures a company puts in place, and those structures can be built deliberately.

Five building blocks of a repeatable M&A process

From single transactions to a continuous process

Building blockWhat it means in practiceWhere to start
Clear responsibilitiesM&A has a named owner instead of being a side task for whoever has capacityAssign ownership for pipeline and process
Defined acquisition criteriaSize range, regions and submarkets, must-have and exclusion criteria, price ceilingPut them on one page
Continuously maintained target pipelineTargets are known before a sale process starts, not when an advisor callsBuild a longlist for your core segment
Fixed cadencePipeline and market are reviewed regularly, independent of current dealsQuarterly review of targets and active competitors
Predefined decision pathsIt is clear who decides what before an opportunity landsAgree how fast an opportunity is assessed, e.g. within five working days

The starting point does not have to be a larger M&A team. What matters is moving M&A from a series of individual transactions to a continuous process. How far to go is a question of ambition. Some experts recommend adopting the transaction discipline of private equity. Hendrik Rathje, Partner at Möhrle Happ Luther, goes furthest:

“Build M&A as a dedicated business unit, just as you would build a strategic sales function.” Hendrik Rathje, Partner, Möhrle Happ Luther

The hard part: keeping the system running

The real challenge often begins after the set-up. A systematic approach has to be maintained day to day: markets need to be monitored, target universes kept current and changes at companies and competitors spotted early. This is where data- and AI-powered solutions can make a structural difference, by making information that used to be researched and consolidated manually available continuously, whether or not a transaction is underway. Technology does not replace the strategic decision. It makes a defined M&A approach sustainable with a manageable effort.

Get the full industry report

The full report contains the complete buyer analysis, the role of financial investors, the regional hotspots, the outlook for next year and all six expert assessments. For more insights, download the report M&A as a System here for free.

Cover of M&A as a System, the StrategyBridgeAI Industry Report
Cover of M&A as a System, the StrategyBridgeAI Industry Report

Frequently asked questions

How many companies make only one acquisition?+

62% of all acquirers in the StrategyBridgeAI dataset have completed exactly one acquisition. Only 11% of them were active as a buyer again in the past two years.

Why do companies stop acquiring after their first deal?+

The experts interviewed for the report point to resources, process know-how and management capacity rather than capital. Fear of a failed integration and the ability to actually close a deal are named as key barriers.

Do you need a large M&A team to acquire systematically?+

No. According to the report, the starting point is not necessarily a larger team but clear structures: responsibilities, defined criteria, a maintained target pipeline, a fixed cadence and predefined decision paths.

What are the building blocks of a systematic M&A process?+

Clear responsibilities, defined acquisition criteria, a continuously maintained target pipeline, a fixed review cadence and decision paths that are agreed before an opportunity arrives.

Are serial acquirers mainly large, established companies?+

They are larger on average, with around 4.5 times the revenue of opportunistic acquirers, but they are also about half as old. Systematic M&A can become part of a growth strategy early on.

Want to keep your target pipeline current without manual research every quarter? Book a demo and see StrategyBridgeAI live with your own use case.

Industry insights

More from this category

Explore related insights from StrategyBridgeAI.

All resources
Cover of M&A as a System, the StrategyBridgeAI Industry Report
Industry insightsNov 10, 2026

Why financial investors acquire twice as often as operating companies

Financial investors are 19% of acquirers but account for 36% of recorded acquisitions. The gap is less about capital than structure. What corporate M&A teams can adopt.

StrategyBridgeAIRead article
Cover of M&A as a System, the StrategyBridgeAI Industry Report
Industry insightsNov 3, 2026

Serial acquirers: why 10% of buyers make 56% of all acquisitions

The most active 10% of acquirers account for 56% of all recorded acquisitions. What separates serial acquirers from one-off buyers, and what it means for your next deal.

StrategyBridgeAIRead article
Abstract illustration on a dark blue StrategyBridgeAI background: a generic AI chat bubble emits data points, two flagged with a coral warning ring for hallucination, while a magnifying glass verifies them against a clean grid of teal, checkmarked data cards
Industry insightsOct 30, 2026

Can AI replace M&A analysts? What generative AI still gets wrong in deal work

Generic AI tools speed up M&A work but still hallucinate on financial data. Here's what they get wrong, and where analyst judgment still decides the deal.

Newsletter

Stay ahead of the market

The latest M&A insights, product updates and event invites — straight to your inbox.